About the Author
----------------
ROGER BENNETT was born in Liverpool and moved to the United
States after university, under the thrall of Ferris Bueller, Hart
to Hart, and Diff'rent Strokes. A writer, broadcaster, and
filmmaker, Bennett began at ESPN and moved with Men in Blazers to
NBC Sports to become the go-to interviewer for the biggest names
in soccer, making films with the likes of Jose Mourinho and Pep
Guardiola. MICHAEL DAVIES was born in London and educated in
Scotland and the United States. For twenty-eight years he has
worked as a television executive and multiple Emmy Award winning
producer of many shows, including Who Wants to Be a Millionaire.
Davies started writing for ESPN.com in 2002 before partnering
with Bennett on Men in Blazers in 2010. In addition to their
podcast and television show on NBC Sports, the duo have a weekly
show built into the phenomenally popular EA Sports FIFA game, and
have developed a large live following.
Read more ( javascript:void(0) )
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
--------------------------------------------------------
Introduction
Hail! Unfortunate Accidental Readers and Great Friends of the
Pod.
The volume you have in your hands was designed to be many
things:
1. The final nail in the coffin of the long-floundering
publishing industry.
2. Living proof that it is possible to write a worse book than
Does God Love Michael’s Two Daddies? by Sheila K. Butt.
3. An ill-advised attempt to journey into the inky dark,
unexplored depths of the Men in Blazers universe, every detail of
which we have created hand in hand with our masochistically loyal
listeners over the past eight years, pod by pod, show by show,
tweet by suboptimal tweet.
To achieve the first two objectives, we chose to focus solely on
the third. This task demanded we wallow in the history and
culture of football, the sport we both love. With its pantheon of
heroes and villains, moments of glorious ecstasy and searing
despair, dodgy haircuts and surplus neck tattoos, it has
empowered us to experience emotions other people seem to feel in
real life, to which we are both inured. No telenovela could
provide soapier story lines to keep us hooked like football . . .
a game with plot points that unfurl live without a safety net, as
the whole world watches.
***
Witnessing the game we love grow and grow in America, the nation
that we love, has been the thrill of our lifetimes. We both
arrived on these shores as innocents, equipped with full heads of
our own hair, in the early 1990s. Back then soccer had seemingly
forever been cast as America’s “Sport of the Future,” its recent
past little more than a collection of false dawns and hyperbolic
predictions that it was about to become the Next Big Thing.
We well remember the day when FIFA announced its intention to
host the 1994 World Cup in the US, prompting panicked
former-AFL-quarterback-turned-US-representative Jack Kemp to
declare on the floor of Congress: “I think it is important for
all those young men out there who someday hope to play real
football where you throw it and kick it and run with it and put
it in your hands a distinction should be made that football is
democratic capitalism whereas soccer is a European sot
sport.”
Yet, slow and steady wins the race. We have watched with wonder,
World Cup to World Cup, as the game's profile has inexorably
risen to the point that the sport’s profile has taken its place
alongside seersucker, cheesesteaks, and the collected works of
Raymond Carver as a symbol of American freedom and democracy.
Indeed, our obsessive love of football and Men in Blazers’ very
existence has been possible only because it was powered and
reinforced by that surging rise of interest, as well as by the
fact that you allow bald men on television in the United States.
The question is often asked as to why, season to season, week to
week, game to game, more and more Americans have fallen under
football’s poetic sway. Many theories have been advanced. Just as
baseball thrived in “the Golden Age of Radio,” and the NFL was
the perfect televisual sport, soccer’s rise has been driven by
the Internet in general, and EA Sports FIFA in particular, which
have enabled fans in Los Angeles or North Dakota to experience
and follow their teams as closely as supporters in Leicester or
Newcastle.
Also, alcohol. If a gent is in a bar drinking a at 7:30 in
the morning, society deems him to be an alcoholic. If Liverpool
are losing to Bournemouth on a television in that very same bar
whilst that afore- mentioned is being quaffed, we consider
that man an American soccer fan. If we have learned only one
thing during our Guinness-stained Men in Blazers odyssey it is
this: Never underestimate the extent to which Americans adore an
excuse to drink during the daytime.
Ultimately, we like to believe football’s American boom has been
made possible by a realization that sporting audiences here have
made en masse—that when they experience soccer, they might not be
watching home runs, end zone dances, or tomahawk dunks. They are
glimpsing life itself unfold before their eyes. The legendary
Arsenal manager Arsène Wenger once articulated this best when he
said, “Football is like real life but in a more condensed way,
more intense. At some moments it catches you suddenly and it can
be very cruel.”
As two men, we could not be more different. One of us is an
optimistic Londoner who believes everything is possible. The
other, a negative Liverpudlian who sees Cossacks lurking behind
every door. Yet we are bonded by a mutual understanding that
soccer in all of its forms—men’s or women’s, international or
club—as long as it is played by bipeds, is the key to
understanding human existence. As George Eliot once said:
Art is the nearest thing to life; it is a mode of amplifying
experience and extending our contact with our fellow-men beyond
the bounds of our personal lot.
If you substitute the word “football” for “art” here, it could
not be better said. This book, then, is for readers who believe
that, or would like to. Fans old or new, young or old, deeply
knowledgeable or neophyte. An encyclopedic collection assembled
at great loss of life, of the greatest games, most legendary
characters, soaring moments, salty chants, and the occasional
self-indulgent yet critical detour, that make up everything you
need to know about the game. Reading this cover to cover might
not improve the way you play the sport, but it will, we hope,
make you better human beings, which is arguably, almost as
important.
Courage.
Rog and Davo
Argentina: Not to go all Paul Krugman on you, but one of the
most admirable things about Argentina’s consistency as a world
footballing power is that while Germany, Brazil, and Italy all
rank among the world’s ten biggest economies (and between them,
they’ve won 13 of the 20 World Cups) Argentina is the economic
outlier. The team that defies the correlation between a nation’s
GDP and their ability to win the big one.
Stylistically, Argentine football has patented a long tradition
of violent beauty. Their fans crave both the Gambetta, a
slaloming style of dribbling run described by the poet Eduardo
Galeano as strumming “the ball as if it was a guitar,” alongside
a cunning guile and physicality that is known as La Nuestra, or
“our style of play.” Thus, Argentine players are able to undo
nents with clinical pace, or by pinging the ball around their
box, but if a groin or kidney presented itself for a good
punching along the way, they could be easily persuaded to give it
a thunderous jab. Thus their great team of the 1950s were known
as the “Angels with Dirty Faces.”
This is a team who will stop at nothing to win, stooping even to
handing nents spiked water bottles during breaks to drug them
in game. When England finally worked out how to beat them in
2002, thanks to a penalty won by a flopping from Michael Owen,
the Argentine media merely nodded their approval at his deceit
and willingness to cheat to win. “THEY’VE LEARNED!” was one
headline.
Yet, Argentina have always been far more than Al Davis–era
Oakland Raiders. Their team always had to be both admired and
feared due to their production line of visionary, creative
playmakers, El Diez, “The Ten”: Juan Román Riquelme, and now
Lionel Messi. Victory leads to sainthood. Lose, and it is all
their fault.
As mighty as they have been in the past, Los Albicelestes have
gone over two decades without winning a trophy. Dakota Fanning
was not yet born when they lifted the 1993 Copa America. Their
teams have been talent-stocked, yet their biggest problem was how
to get the best out of Lionel Messi. As revered as he was,
Argentines remained suspicious of the man who moved to Barcelona
aged fourteen, viewing him as a foreigner, El Catalán, who never
shone in an Argentine journey and even retired briefly from
international football with tears in his eyes after misfiring in
a doomed penalty shootout loss after 2016’s Copa America
Centenario final.
Despite their ongoing agony, the Argentinians find reason for
optimism. The pope, Francis, was born in Buenos Aires and is
football mad. Their fans draw solace from his support. “If one
Argentine can do what he does,” they say, “just imagine what
twenty- three can do.”
Best Day of the Season: The first morning of any Premier League
season is among the finest days of the year. Up there in our book
with Veterans Day, Memorial Day, Yom Kippur, Independence Day,
Martin Luther King Day, and Churchill Day. Squads have been
refreshed. New players have arrived. Everyone has a fresh new
haircut. The ink on their recently acquired neck tattoos has
barely dried.
Few occasions in football carry such a sense of collective
anticipation and hope. Three hundred eighty games lie ahead of us
over 228 days. Each an unknown voyage of discovery within which
everything feels pure and possible. Rationally, the Premier
League may be a set of mini leagues within a league (six teams
battling for top four, four for mid-table obscurity, the rest to
avoid relegation), but on the first day of the season every fan
suspends disbelief and listens to their fast-beating heart which
assures them that their team’s newly acquired striker will hit
the ground running and score 25 league goals, that injury-prone
play- maker will have the season of his life, and the young
loanee from Seville whose name is un-pronounceable will reveal
himself to be a diamond in the rough. The moment before the
referee’s whistle blows is one thick with prayer. A ball has not
been kicked. Dreams are not yet dashed. Everything is possible.
Fighting: English footballers are high-performance sportsmen who
excel in every athletic pursuit except for one: They are terrible
at fighting. Whilst Argentinian football players are sufficiently
brazen to fire tear canisters at their nents, and
Brazilian football is replete with referee beheadings, Premier
League violence has a ritualized choreography, part chaste
Victorian courtship, part Thracian War dance in which anger must
be channeled into six customary steps of erotic rutting:
Step one: Two players, most commonly one English hardman and one
fancy foreigner from Spain or Italy who “does not like it up
’em.”
Step two: After the initial clash, Johnny Foreigner elects to
“leave a foot in.”
Step three: Both players are now deprived of free will.
Footballing lore dictates they must confront each other, height
differential or weight class be damned.
Step four: Foreheads must be placed in the general vicinity of
nents like bull elks rutting to prove their dominance in
front of the herd.
Step five: Both players pray for the slightest contact, mere
molecule grazing satisfactory.
Step six: Contact or imagined contact is sufficient cause for
player to fling himself backward in the style of Capa’s “Falling
Soldier.” NB: If the player toppling backward is Johnny
Foreigner, cue color commentator to declare “We need to stamp
that behavior out of the game.” If the player is English hardman
expect, color commentary to effect of “He must have felt
something, because he is not that type of player.”
Judge Ivor Bennett Time: My her had two footballing rules he
lived by. The first was “It only takes a second to score a goal.”
A relentlessly optimistic phrase he would habitually utter
whenever Everton went behind in a game. As a child, I drew
tremendous comfort from those words, only for my faith to be
shattered in 1982 when Liverpool demolished Everton 5–0. As the
clock ticked past the 90th minute, I remember turning round to my
her and inquiring innocently, “We can still get back into this
game, right, Dad? There are still at least five seconds left—we
could score five goals in those seconds because it only takes a
second to score a goal.” After watching his footballing gods
proven to have feet of clay, my her was in no mood to indulge
me. “Don’t be stupid,” he spat sharply. “Only a fool would
believe in that ridiculous cliché.”
My her’s second rule lives on. He firmly believes goals
scored either in the 44th minute of the first half or the 46th of
the second were debilitating for the conceding team. The first
because their manager would have to tear up his halftime
talk and brief his team on the fly. The second because whatever
instructions handed out in the locker room had immediately been
rendered irrelevant.
If we are watching an Everton game and the team concede around
the halftime break, his muttering groan of “that is the worst
time to let in a goal” stings like salt in a wound. For what it
is worth, his other great belief is that bedrooms should be kept
cold. Very cold and damp, if possible. In Judge Ivor Bennett’s
mind, “a cold room is the first value that leads to success.” —RB
Mullets: A bi-level haircut named from molet (fourteenth-century
Middle English), mulet (Anglo-French), mullus (Latin), and myllos
(Greek), the hairstyle has secreted its traces across history,
appearing first on the Sphinx in Giza, being imported to North
America on the head of Revolutionary War general Horatio Gates,
and then perfected by Facts of Life–era George Clooney. The cut
has many power bases, including the American South and in minor
hockey leagues all over the Canadian prairie, yet few cultures
have been such a global melting pot for the mullet as World
Football. Its popularity can perhaps be explained by its ability
to communicate so many different things. The “South American
Mullet” owned by Kun Agüero when he broke through with Atlético
said “Baller.” Mesut Őzil’s blond “Mullet of Youth” said “I
think differently.” Newcastle and Spurs icon Chris Waddle’s
“Northern Mullett” said “It’s 1990 and I am English.” The 1980s
Bulgarian defender Trifon Ivanov’s “Eastern European Enforcer
Mullet” said “I give you Levi’s, you be wife?,” and US 1994
goalkeeping hero Tony Meola’s “Jersey Chic” do screamed “I am
just lookin’ for a haircut that looks cool with stonewashed
denim.”
Read more ( javascript:void(0) )